Publication System Publication System

Impact of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Hippocampal Function in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease Induced by Rotenone

Original Research | Open access | Published: 10 July 2025
Volume 0, article number 118, (0) Cite this article
You have full access to this open access article.
,
  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Development and Toxicology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
123 Accesses

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease stands as the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. This study aimed to assess the impact of DMSO in a rotenone-induced rat model of Parkinson’s disease. DMSO has become a popular agent in preclinical and clinical studies due to its ability to facilitate the transport of poorly soluble drugs across the blood-brain barrier. In this investigation, we explored how a three-week treatment with rotenone, combined with DMSO, influenced hippocampal neuronal activity and the properties of neuronal responses in rats. We specifically compared the toxic effects of rotenone on hippocampal CA1 and CA3 neurons in the presence of DMSO. Our results showed that rotenone induced substantial morphological changes in hippocampal cells. Following DMSO treatment, however, there was a significant restoration of pyramidal cells and Nissl bodies within the CA1 and CA3 regions. DMSO also effectively suppressed both outward and inward currents. Additionally, we recorded spontaneous and evoked spike activity in the hippocampus of rats treated with DMSO (1 ml/kg, administered intraperitoneally for 3 weeks). While rotenone elevated TP and produced a moderate TD effect, DMSO also increased TP but produced a more pronounced TD effect. The analysis indicated inhibitory responses in the hippocampus following high-frequency stimulation (100 Hz for 1 second) of the ipsilateral entorhinal cortex.

Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles in related subjects:

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) ranks as the 2nd most common neurodegenerative condition associated with aging. The rotenone rat model of PD is a widely used research tool that has been extensively studied for its ability to simulate key aspects of the disease [1]. In this model, rotenone induces motor deficits, though it does not cause significant damage to dopaminergic neurons [2, 3]. Research has identified the hippocampus as a critical region for the memory impairments observed in Parkinson’s disease, with both functional and structural abnormalities in this area reported in patients with sporadic [4, 5] and inherited forms of the disease [4, 6]. Furthermore, dysfunction in the hippocampus is strongly associated with cognitive decline and behavioral changes, including memory deficits [7, 8]. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is frequently employed as a solvent to deliver drugs that are poorly soluble in water. It is commonly used in both in vivo and in vitro neuroscience studies due to its ability to dissolve various pharmacological compounds [9]. Numerous studies have highlighted the biological impacts of DMSO, particularly within neurology [10]. For example, DMSO inhibits key ion currents such as Na+, K+, and Ca2+ [11], and it has been shown to alter membrane permeability by blocking the effects of neurotransmitters like acetylcholine, glutamate, and GABA in Aplysia ganglion cells [12]. DMSO also reduces NMDA receptor activation and suppresses both NMDA and AMPA currents in hippocampal neurons [9]. Known for its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, DMSO has therapeutic potential in conditions such as traumatic brain injury, where it lowers intracranial pressure and improves cerebral blood flow without affecting blood pressure [13]. This study aims to evaluate hippocampal neuronal activity in a rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease model and to investigate the effects of DMSO treatment on male rats following rotenone exposure.

Materials and Methods

Animal subjects

A total of ten male Wistar rats, each weighing between 200 and 240 grams, were used in this experiment. They were housed in polycarbonate cages with 5 rats per cage in a climate-controlled room maintained at 24 °C, 45% humidity, and a 12-hour light/dark cycle. The animals’ body weight was monitored daily throughout the study.

The research was conducted in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive (2010/63/UE) and received approval from the Ethics Committee of Yerevan State Medical University (Approval code: N4 IRB APPROVAL, November 15, 2018).

Experimental design

The rats were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received rotenone (2.5 mg/kg) subcutaneously every other day for 21 days, with sunflower oil (Sigma-Aldrich) as the solvent. In contrast, group B received 1% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; 1 milliliter per kilogram; i.p.) for 21 days (3 weeks of rotenone administration followed by 3 weeks of DMSO treatment).

In vivo neuronal activity recording

At the conclusion of the 6 weeks, the rats were euthanized using a deep urethane anesthesia (1.1 grams per kilogram, i.p.). To immobilize the animals, 1% dithylinum (25 mg/kg, i.p.) was used. After anesthesia, the rats were positioned in a stereotactic apparatus and maintained on artificial respiration. A 3 M KCl-filled microelectrode was stereotactically inserted into the hippocampus to record extracellular neuronal activity, following brain atlas coordinates (AP – 3.2-3.5; L ± 1.5–3.5; DV +2.8–4.0 mm) [14]. High-frequency stimulation (HFS, one hundred Hz for one second) was delivered to the contralateral entorhinal cortex using bipolar silver electrodes, with rectangular pulses of 0.05 ms duration and 0.6–0.8 mA amplitude (Figure 1). The coordinates for the stimulation electrode in the ipsilateral entorhinal cortex were set to AP -9, L 3.5, and DV +4.0 millimeters. Data analysis of interspike intervals and spike frequencies was performed using the Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, as previously outlined [15].

Figure 1. Depictions of Rotenone and DMSO molecular structures. The rat hippocampus is shown using the stereotaxic coordinates from Watson and Paxinos. A blue line marks the electrode positioning.

Figure 1. Depictions of Rotenone and DMSO molecular structures. The rat hippocampus is shown using the stereotaxic coordinates from Watson and Paxinos. A blue line marks the electrode positioning. 

Morphological examination (Nissl staining)

Following the rotenone and DMSO treatments, the rats were euthanized six weeks later, and their brains were preserved in a 4% formalin solution in phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4) after each electrophysiological assessment. The hippocampus was sliced into serial frozen sections, which were first washed twice with phosphate buffer, then immersed in a 0.5% cresyl violet acid solution for 30 minutes. The sections were then processed through ethanol solutions of 70%, 95%, and 100%, followed by a rinse in distilled water. Afterward, the slices were cleaned twice in xylene, each for five minutes. The tissue was then mounted with an organic medium composed of polystyrene, dibutyl phthalate, and xylene. Histological images of the hippocampus were captured using a light microscope and digital camera after the slices had dried. The rat brain atlas was used to examine histological sections [16, 17].

Results and Discussion

Analysis of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal responses in the hippocampus to ipsilateral entorhinal cortex High-Frequency Stimulation (HFS)

The detailed characteristics of these cells have been described earlier [15]. To investigate the effects of rotenone and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), extracellular recordings were performed on hippocampal neurons. In the rotenone-treated group, tetanic potentiation (TP) in the hippocampus was observed to be 2.65 times higher (MTT = 39.69 / MBE = 14.96 spikes per second) during high-frequency stimulation (one hundred Hz for one second) as compared to the baseline (Figure 2a), while the TP PTP responses were 1.96 times greater (MTT = 23.39 / MBE = 11.93 spike/sec). There was a significant difference in TP responses between the rotenone and DMSO groups (P < 0.05). For tetanic depression (TD) during HFS, the rate of occurrence was four times higher in neurons showing TD PTP responses (MBE = 35.69 / MTT = 8.91 spikes/sec) and five times higher in neurons exhibiting TD responses (MBE = 42.18 / MTT = 8.42 spikes per second) in the DMSO group (Figure 2b).

Figure 2. Influence of rotenone and DMSO on neuronal firing in the hippocampus. The spike activity of a single neuron is displayed for 20 seconds before (BE) and after (PE) high-frequency stimulation (HFS), highlighting TP* and TD* responses. Neurons exhibiting TP, TP PTP, TD, and TD PTD responses were analyzed for their average spike rate at three different time points: 20 seconds before stimulation (M BE), during stimulation (M HFS), and 20 seconds after stimulation (M PE).

Figure 2. Influence of rotenone and DMSO on neuronal firing in the hippocampus. The spike activity of a single neuron is displayed for 20 seconds before (BE) and after (PE) high-frequency stimulation (HFS), highlighting TP* and TD* responses. Neurons exhibiting TP, TP PTP, TD, and TD PTD responses were analyzed for their average spike rate at three different time points: 20 seconds before stimulation (M BE), during stimulation (M HFS), and 20 seconds after stimulation (M PE).

Histological examination

Rotenone treatment induced marked morphological variations in the hippocampal neurons. Although the neurons retained their staining properties following rotenone exposure, they became noticeably wrinkled. Irregular staining patterns were evident in the hippocampal cells [18]. The Nissl substance in neurons was disrupted, and some cells showed edema. A shift in the distribution of tigroids to the outer edges of specific neurons was observed. Most of the neurons in the rotenone group showed signs of pyknosis (Figure 3). These pyknotic neurons were characterized by their reduced size, distinct oblong shape, and accumulation of dense chromatophilic material (or Nissl bodies) in the cytoplasm. Their nuclei appeared diffusely basophilic, elongated, or triangular, with nucleoli barely detectable.

Figure 3. Nissl staining of hippocampal neurons from the rotenone group. Scale bar: A-C 100 µm.

Figure 3. Nissl staining of hippocampal neurons from the rotenone group. Scale bar: A-C 100 µm.

As depicted in Figure 4, neurons in the DMSO group exhibited round to oval-shaped nuclei. The chromatophilic substances within these neurons were distributed throughout the cytoplasm in small clumps with lighter spaces between them. The hippocampal morphology in the DMSO group was characterized by both hyperchromic and hypochromic cells. Neuronal processes extended over short distances, with cell outlines clearly visible, and some neurons displayed light-colored nuclei. Overall, the condition of the nervous tissue showed varying levels of functional activity, indicated by the presence of hyperchromic neurons (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Nissl staining of hippocampal neurons from rats treated with DMSO. Scale bar: A-C 100 µm.

Figure 4. Nissl staining of hippocampal neurons from rats treated with DMSO. Scale bar: A-C 100 µm.

 

This study explored the effects of 3 weeks of rotenone and DMSO treatment on hippocampal neuronal activity and response patterns in rats. We compared the impact of rotenone on hippocampal CA1 and CA3 cells pre-treated with DMSO. In the DMSO-treated group, hippocampal neurons appeared well-formed, with clearly visible nucleoli, lightly colored cytoplasm, and an organized structure. In contrast, the rotenone-treated group displayed significant cellular damage, including shrinkage, irregular cell shapes, membrane contraction, darkly stained pyknotic nuclei, dispersed neurons, and fewer pyramidal cells and Nissl bodies. However, following DMSO treatment, the pyramidal cells and Nissl bodies in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus in the rotenone group displayed substantial recovery (Figures 3 and 4).

From these observations, it can be concluded that rotenone, which inhibits mitochondrial complex I, exerts a different influence on hippocampal synaptic plasticity compared to DMSO. The rotenone group exhibited greater tetanic potentiation, suggesting increased synaptic strength and plasticity following high-frequency stimulation, implying that rotenone might enhance the excitability of hippocampal neurons. Conversely, the DMSO group showed stronger inhibitory responses to high-frequency stimulation (HFS) than the rotenone group (Figure 2), whereas their excitatory responses to HFS were less pronounced. TD and TD PTD were significantly present in the hippocampal neurons (65% and 30%, respectively). These results indicate that DMSO treatment enhanced inhibitory signaling, thereby counterbalancing the heightened neuronal excitability induced by rotenone. The disruption in synaptic balance between excitation and inhibition enabled the system to adjust to new pathological challenges. The dynamic nature of excitation/inhibition allows the neural circuit to operate in a switch-like fashion, amplifying brief high-frequency bursts and transmitting signals with place-field-like characteristics [19]. Excitatory input supports spike integration, while feed-forward inhibition prevents it, reflecting two opposing plasticity mechanisms [20]. In prior experiments using the same rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease model, we observed that hippocampal neurons favored excitatory activity during high-frequency stimulation of the entorhinal cortex [21].

DMSO is a solvent often used for its ability to mix with water and enhance the permeability of biological membranes, facilitating the absorption of substances that would not otherwise dissolve in water [22]. The impact of DMSO varies depending on factors like the type of cells involved, the specific experimental setup, and its concentration. When tested in cell cultures, DMSO has been demonstrated to alter the excitability of cells by influencing the movement of key ions such as Ca+2, Na+, K+, and Cl- [23, 24]. It has been reported to suppress currents mediated by NMDA and AMPA receptors while decreasing NMDA receptor activation in cultured neurons [9]. In contrast, DMSO inhibits GABA-induced currents in dorsal ganglion neurons from rats [24].

Furthermore, studies conducted both in vitro and in vivo have shown that DMSO administration increases dendritic spine density in a region-specific manner in the hippocampus of APPSDL mice. Behavioral effects of DMSO include improvements in hippocampal-dependent spatial memory accuracy, modulation of olfactory habituation independent of the hippocampus, and reductions in anxiety-like behavior [25]. In adult rats, DMSO treatment has been linked to behavioral alterations thought to reflect changes in hippocampal or cortical activity [26, 27].

As a neuroprotective agent, DMSO is particularly beneficial in severe brain injury, where it can help protect against secondary neuronal death [28]. Its use has been associated with a specific increase in hippocampal spine density in APPSDL mice, both in vivo and ex vivo. Drugs that block the excessive influx of Na+ into brain cells have demonstrated notable neuroprotective effects in models of brain ischemia and hypoxia, with ongoing clinical trials examining their potential in treating cerebral ischemia [29, 30]. DMSO’s neuroprotective properties are believed to stem from its ability to block Na+ channels, thereby helping prevent cellular damage in the brain following injury or ischemia [31]. Modulation of D1/D5 receptors has been shown to affect long-term potentiation in the CA1 region, which is essential for memory processes. This suggests that reduced dopamine signaling in the hippocampus could impair LTP, potentially contributing to memory issues seen in Parkinson’s disease [32, 33]. Additionally, rotenone has been observed to reduce the delayed rectifier K+ current [34], while enhancing the ATP-sensitive K+ current [35] and Ca2+-activated K+ channels with high conductance [36]. Furthermore, rotenone increases NMDA-induced currents in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra [37, 38]. The CA1 neurons in the hippocampus and the striatum are highly susceptible to stress caused by ischemia and metabolic disruptions [38, 39].

Surprisingly, inhibiting GABAergic signaling proves detrimental, especially under conditions of energy scarcity, and enhancing GABAergic modulation could be a potential neuroprotective approach in scenarios with high metabolic demands [39]. Co-activation of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors has been shown to protect against ischemia-induced neurodegeneration in vitro. Earlier studies suggested that rotenone’s inhibition of mitochondrial complex I impacts the hippocampus less severely than the striatum [40]; however, increasing evidence aligns with our findings that the hippocampus is notably sensitive to rotenone toxicity [21]. As a critical brain region involved in numerous cognitive functions, including learning and memory, the hippocampus is highly vulnerable to oxidative stress. Mitochondrial byproducts, such as ATP and reactive oxygen species (ROS), are pivotal for maintaining hippocampal synaptic transmission [41]. In the mHippoE-18 model, rotenone induces neuronal death in hippocampal cells [42]. Disruptions in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) and impairments in hippocampal-dependent memory were observed in transgenic mice expressing human alpha-synuclein (alpha-syn120) under the tyrosine hydroxylase promoter [43]. Collectively, these results suggest that both rotenone and DMSO influence synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, though they exert opposite effects on TP and TD responses. While rotenone enhances TP and induces a milder TD response, DMSO boosts TP while eliciting a more pronounced TD response. This suggests that rotenone and DMSO may exert divergent effects on hippocampal neuronal excitability and plasticity [44]. Rotenone amplifies TP and produces a milder TD reaction, while DMSO boosts TP but causes a more pronounced TD effect. This suggests that the effects of rotenone and DMSO on hippocampal neurons’ excitability and synaptic plasticity differ significantly.

Conclusion

To conclude, the rotenone-treated rat model mimicked the functional deficits characteristic of Parkinson’s disease, particularly affecting hippocampal neurons, whereas DMSO administration altered their excitability.

Acknowledgements

We extend our thanks to Dr. Susanna Hakobyan for her valuable contribution to the histological work.

Conflict of interest

None

Financial support

None

Ethics statement

The study adhered to the ethical standards outlined in the European Communities Council Directive (2010/63/UE) and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yerevan State Medical University under approval code N4 IRB APPROVAL on November 15, 2018.

References

Cannon JR, Tapias V, Na HM, Honick AS, Drolet RE, Greenamyre JT. A highly reproducible rotenone model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;34(2):279-90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.01.016
Betarbet R, Sherer TB, MacKenzie G, Garcia-Osuna M, Panov AV, Greenamyre JT. Chronic systemic pesticide exposure reproduces features of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(12):1301-6.
https://doi.org/10.1038/81834
Masato A, Plotegher N, Boassa D, Bubacco L. Impaired dopamine metabolism in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):35.
Joelving FC, Billeskov R, Christensen JR, West M, Pakkenberg B. Hippocampal neuron and glial cell numbers in Parkinson’s disease—a stereological study. Hippocampus. 2006;16(10):826-33.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20212
Helton TD, Otsuka T, Lee MC, Mu Y, Ehlers MD. Pruning and loss of excitatory synapses by the parkin ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(49):19492-7.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802280105
Shohamy D, Myers CE, Hopkins RO, Sage J, Gluck MA. Distinct hippocampal and basal ganglia contributions to probabilistic learning and reversal. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(9):1820-32.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21138
Jokinen P, Brück A, Aalto S, Forsback S, Parkkola R, Rinne JO. Impaired cognitive performance in Parkinson’s disease is related to caudate dopaminergic hypofunction and hippocampal atrophy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009;15(2):88-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.03.005
Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Ramirez-Ruiz B, Tolosa E, Marti MJ, Valldeoriola F, Bargallo N, et al. Hippocampal head atrophy predominance in Parkinson’s disease with hallucinations and with dementia. J Neurol. 2008;255:1324-31.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0885-8
Lu C, Mattson MP. Dimethyl sulfoxide suppresses NMDA-and AMPA-induced ion currents and calcium influx and protects against excitotoxic death in hippocampal neurons. Exp Neurol. 2001;170(1):180-5.
https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.2001.7686
Mekereș GM, Buhaș CL, Tudoran C, Csep AN, Tudoran M, Manole F, et al. The practical utility of psychometric scales for the assessment of the impact of posttraumatic scars on mental health. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1103714.
Rosenblum WI, Wei EP, Kontos HA. Dimethylsulfoxide and ethanol, commonly used diluents, prevent dilation of pial arterioles by openers of KATP ion channels. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;430(1):101-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01361-9
Sawada M, Sato M. The effect of dimethyl sulfoxide on the neuronal excitability and cholinergic transmission in Aplysia ganglion cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975;243:337-57.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb25375.x
Brown FD, Johns LM, Mullan S. Dimethyl sulfoxide in experimental brain injury, with comparison to mannitol. J Neurosurg. 1980;53(1):58-62.
https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1980.53.1.0058
Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates: compact, 6th edn. Academic Press, Cambridge. 2005.
Darbinyan LV, Hambardzumyan LE, Simonyan KV, Chavushyan VA, Manukyan LP, Sarkisian VH. Rotenone impairs hippocampal neuronal activity in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Pathophysiology. 2017;24(1):23-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2017.01.001
Bancroft JD, Gamble M. Theory and practice of histological techniques, 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London; 2008.
Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 6th edn. Academic Press, San Diego; 2007.
Mekeres GM, Buhaș CL, Csep AN, Beiușanu C, Andreescu G, Marian P, et al. The importance of psychometric and physical scales for the evaluation of the consequences of scars—A literature review. ClinPract. 2023;13(2):372-83.
Moreno A, Morris RG, Canals S. Frequency-dependent gating of hippocampal-neocortical interactions. CerebCortex. 2016;26(5):2105-14.
Bartley AF, Dobrunz LE. Short‐term plasticity regulates the excitation/inhibition ratio and the temporal window for spike integration in CA 1 pyramidal cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2015;41(11):1402-15.
Darbinyan LV, Hambardzumyan LE, Simonyan KV, Chavushyan VA, Manukyan LP, Badalyan SA, et al. Protective effects of curcumin against rotenone-induced rat model of Parkinson’s disease: In vivo electrophysiological and behavioral study. Metab Brain Dis. 2017;32:1791-803.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-017-0060-y
Dumitru M, Vrinceanu D, Banica B, Cergan R, Taciuc IA, Manole F, et al. Management of aesthetic and functional deficits in frontal bone trauma. Medicina. 2022;58(12):1756.
Ogura T, Shuba LM, McDonald TF. Action potentials, ionic currents and cell water in guinea pig ventricular preparations exposed to dimethyl sulfoxide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;273(3):1273-86.
Nakahiro M, Arakawa O, Narahashi T, Ukai S, Kato Y, Nishinuma K, et al. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) blocks GABA-induced current in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neurosci Lett. 1992;138(1):5-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(92)90459-k
Penazzi L, Lorengel J, Sündermann F, Golovyashkina N, Marre S, Mathis CM, et al. DMSO modulates CNS function in a preclinical Alzheimer’s disease model. Neuropharmacology. 2017;113:434-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.10.020
Authier N, Dupuis E, Kwasiborski A, Eschalier A, Coudoré F. Behavioural assessment of dimethylsulfoxide neurotoxicity in rats. Toxicol Lett. 2002;132(2):117-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00052-8
Rabow Z, Morningstar T, Showalter M, Heil H, Thongphanh K, Fan S, et al. Exposure to DMSO during infancy alters neurochemistry, social interactions, and brain morphology in long-evans rats. Brain Behav. 2021;11(5):e02146.
Di Giorgio AM, Hou Y, Zhao X, Zhang B, Lyeth BG, Russell MJ. Dimethyl sulfoxide provides neuroprotection in a traumatic brain injury model. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2008;26(6):501-7.
Sanchez-Sandoval AL, Hernández-Plata E, Gomora JC. Voltage-gated sodium channels: from roles and mechanisms in the metastatic cell behavior to clinical potential as therapeutic targets. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1206136.
Calabresi P, Marfia GA, Centonze D, Pisani A, Bernardi G. Sodium influx plays a major role in the membrane depolarization induced by oxygen and glucose deprivation in rat striatal spiny neurons. Stroke. 1999;30(1):171-9.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.1.171
Bardutzky J, Meng X, Bouley J, Duong TQ, Ratan R, Fisher M. Effects of intravenous dimethyl sulfoxide on ischemia evolution in a rat permanent occlusion model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25(8):968-77.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600095
Sheynikhovich D, Otani S, Bai J, Arleo A. Long-term memory, synaptic plasticity and dopamine in rodent medial prefrontal cortex: role in executive functions. Front Behav Neurosci. 2023;16:1068271.
Hagena H, Stacho M, Laja A, Manahan-Vaughan D. Strain-dependent regulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation by dopamine D1/D5 receptors in mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022;16:1023361.
Gao XF, Wang W, He C. Rotenone inhibits delayed rectifier K+ current via a protein kinase A-dependent mechanism. Neuroreport. 2008;19(14):1401-5.
Struzyna LA, Browne KD, Burrell JC, Vélez WJG, Wofford KL, Kaplan HM, et al. Axonal tract reconstruction using a tissue-engineered nigrostriatal pathway in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):13985.
Dong L, Xie MJ, Zhang P, Ji LL, Liu WC, Dong MQ, et al. Rotenone partially reverses decreased BKCa currents in cerebral artery smooth muscle cells from streptozotocin‐induced diabetic mice. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009;36(10):e57-64.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05222.x
Wu YN, Johnson SW. Rotenone potentiates NMDA currents in substantia nigra dopamine neurons. Neurosci Lett. 2007;421(2):96-100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.05.030
Sims NR, Pulsinelli WA. Altered mitochondrial respiration in selectively vulnerable brain subregions following transient forebrain ischemia in the rat. J Neurochem. 1987;49(5):1367-74.
Calabresi P, Centonze D, Bernardi G. Cellular factors controlling neuronal vulnerability in the brain: a lesson from the striatum. Neurology. 2000;55(9):1249-55.
https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.9.1249
Tassone A, Meringolo M, Ponterio G, Bonsi P, Schirinzi T, Martella G. Mitochondrial bioenergy in neurodegenerative disease: Huntington and Parkinson. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(8):7221.
Walters GC, Usachev YM. Mitochondrial calcium cycling in neuronal function and neurodegeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1094356.
Milowska K, Szwed A, Zablocka M, Caminade AM, Majoral JP, Mignani S, et al. In vitro PAMAM, phosphorus and viologen-phosphorus dendrimers prevent rotenone-induced cell damage. Int J Pharm. 2014;474(1-2):42-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.08.010
Tofaris GK, Reitböck PG, Humby T, Lambourne SL, O’Connell M, Ghetti B, et al. Pathological changes in dopaminergic nerve cells of the substantia nigra and olfactory bulb in mice transgenic for truncated human α-synuclein (1–120): implications for Lewy body disorders. J Neurosci. 2006;26(15):3942-50.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4965-05.2006
Dumitru M, Berghi ON, Taciuc IA, Vrinceanu D, Manole F, Costache A. Could artificial intelligence prevent intraoperative anaphylaxis? Reference review and proof of concept. Medicina. 2022;58(11):1530.

Author information

Lucas Pereira & Bruno Martins contributed to this work.

Authors and affiliations

Department of Pharmaceutical Development and Toxicology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
Lucas Pereira & Bruno Martins

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Pereira

Rights and permissions

Open Access The author(s) retain copyright. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. It may be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes with appropriate attribution, an indication of changes, and distribution of adaptations under the same license. Third-party material may be subject to separate terms identified in its credit line. View the license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

About this article

Cite this article

Vancouver
Pereira L, Martins B. Impact of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Hippocampal Function in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease Induced by Rotenone. . 0;0:118.
APA
Pereira, L., & Martins, B. (0). Impact of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Hippocampal Function in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease Induced by Rotenone. EAMD 3, 0, 118.
Received
15 February 2025
Revised
31 March 2025
Accepted
15 May 2025
Published
10 July 2025
Version of record
10 July 2025

Share this article

Easily share this article with others using the link below:

Impact of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Hippocampal Function in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease Induced by Rotenone
Scan to access
this article

Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress:
Submission Portal Author Guidelines

Follow this journal
Get notified of new updates and articles.