Publication System Publication System

The Toxicology of Novichok Nerve Agents: Mechanisms, Manifestations, and Management

Review | Open access | Published: 10 January 2022
Volume 0, article number 30, (0) Cite this article
You have full access to this open access article.
,
  1. Department of Pharmacology and Drug Development, Faculty of Pharmacy, IIT Delhi, New Delhi, India
113 Accesses

Abstract

Nerve agents are among the most potent and widely recognized chemical weapons. Recently, a new class of nerve agents, known as Novichok, has emerged as both a hazardous and frequently utilized tool in terrorist attacks. Medical professionals must gain a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental chemical and pharmacological properties of Novichok agents. This article provides a detailed review of the history, development, chemical structure, mechanism of action, toxicokinetics, and toxicology of these agents. Additionally, it discusses the latest diagnostic and treatment approaches for poisoning caused by Novichok agents. Contrary to earlier beliefs, Novichok poisoning shares similarities with other organophosphate toxins and can be effectively managed with timely and appropriate treatment. Given the global threat posed by terrorist incidents involving these agents, medical teams need to be well-versed in their characteristics to ensure optimal diagnosis and care for affected individuals.

Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles in related subjects:

Introduction

Chemical weapons, or chemical warfare agents, are substances intentionally designed to inflict harm, disability, or death through their toxic characteristics [1-3]. These weapons are categorized alongside biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) because of their potential to cause large-scale casualties and destruction [1, 4, 5]. Chemical weapons can be classified based on factors such as chemical composition, physical state, toxicity level, harmful effects, and the specific organs they target. The main categories include nerve agents, blistering agents (vesicants), chemical asphyxiants, pulmonary irritants, tear agents (riot control agents), and incapacitating agents [6, 7].

Nerve agents are among the most dangerous and potent types of chemical weapons. These compounds, which fall under the organophosphate group, are among the most toxic due to their ability to inhibit the enzyme acetylcholinesterase. Historically, nerve agents like Tabun and Sarin have been used in warfare, including the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), and other agents such as Sarin and VX have been deployed in terrorist attacks. Recently, a new class of highly toxic nerve agents known as Novichok has emerged and has been used in recent terrorist incidents [2-9]. For medical professionals, especially those specializing in emergency care, clinical toxicology, forensic medicine, and forensic toxicology, understanding the chemical and toxicological properties of these agents is vital. This knowledge is essential for effectively responding to chemical terrorism, diagnosing and treating poisoned individuals, and investigating deaths resulting from chemical attacks [7-11].

This paper reviews the toxicological aspects of Novichok, covering its history, chemical structure, physicochemical properties, mechanism of action, toxicokinetics, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches, and the latest treatment options for poisoning.

Results and Discussion

History

In 1934, before the outbreak of World War II, Germany initiated a project at the Farben Chemical Industries Company, led by Dr. Gerhard Schrader, to develop new insecticides [12-15]. By 1936, Schrader’s team began focusing on organophosphorus-based compounds, eventually synthesizing over 2,000 chemicals within a decade [15, 16]. In 1936, the team succeeded in producing Tabun (GA), the first highly toxic organophosphate compound. In 1939, they developed Sarin (GB), which was found to be ten times more toxic than Tabun.

Until the early 1950s, most chemical weapons were designed as unitary weapons, meaning that ammunition such as bombs, bullets, mortars, grenades, and cannons were directly filled with toxic chemical agents and stored in this form until deployment. The risks associated with potential poisoning during the production, storage, and disposal of outdated or defective munitions, combined with the need for complex and expensive methods of destruction, led to environmental concerns regarding the storage of these weapons. These factors spurred research into reducing the risks associated with chemical weapons, which culminated in the development of the Binary Lethal Weapons System in the United States [17, 18].

The term “Novichok” is derived from the Russian word for “newcomer” [15-20]. It does not refer to a single substance but to a series of two-component chemical agents, which are analogs of Class A nerve agents. These substances include A-242 (Novichok-5), A-262 (Novichok-7), and others such as A-234 and Substance-33, all of which belong to the newer generation of nerve agents. Novichok is regarded as the third generation of nerve agents and the fourth generation of chemical weapons, with the first generation being sulfur mustard [15-18]. Information regarding the nature, physicochemical properties, and toxicology of Novichok agents was classified under the Foliant project. It remained restricted until the early 1990s, after which it was disclosed following the signing of the International Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. In 1992, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Will Mirzayanov, an expert in analytical chemistry and a former member of the Soviet State Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, published an article in Moscow News revealing details about this secret research project [15, 18, 21]. Following this revelation, Mirzayanov was arrested for treason but was later released due to public pressure, eventually emigrating to the United States. This disclosure alerted the Western world to the existence of a new generation of nerve agents more toxic than those previously known. However, much of the detailed information regarding the synthesis, toxicity, and military applications of Novichok remains unknown due to the highly classified nature of the project. Most of the available data comes from publications by researchers such as Vladimir O. Mirzayanov, Golf, and Andrey Zheleznyakov, who were involved in the project [18, 21]. Notably, until 2018, there were no published studies on Novichok in the reliable PubMed database, and only after the use of these agents in terrorist incidents in 2018 did references to them begin to appear. As of the time of this review, only 22 articles discussing the chemical and toxicological properties of Novichok agents have been published in journals indexed in this database.

The use of novichok in chemical terrorism

Although Novichok agents have not been deployed as chemical weapons in conventional warfare, recent chemical terrorist attacks involving these nerve agents have drawn significant international attention. One of the earliest suspected uses of Novichok for chemical assassination was in 1995 in Moscow, where Russian banker Ivan Kiolidi and his secretary, Zara Ismailova, were reportedly poisoned through a contaminated office phone. Kiolidi, 46 years old, survived for three days, while Ismailova, 35, died in the hospital one month later, both having been exposed to a military-grade organophosphorus nerve agent. However, the world’s attention to Novichok agents intensified following the 2018 poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in the UK, which further highlighted the potential for these nerve agents to be used in high-profile chemical terrorism [18-22].

Signs and symptoms of poisoning

Novichok agents, like other organophosphates, irreversibly inhibit acetylcholinesterase, leading to a range of symptoms due to acetylcholine accumulation. The clinical signs of poisoning are similar to those caused by other nerve agents, with the severity depending on factors such as the type of agent, dosage, and the route of exposure. Symptoms may begin as soon as 30 seconds to 2 minutes after exposure. Poisoning typically results in a cholinergic toxic syndrome [1-3, 14, 23-25].

When exposed to small amounts, particularly through inhalation, the symptoms primarily affect the respiratory system. These may include a runny nose, difficulty breathing, chest tightness, bronchial constriction, and excessive mucus production in the airways, leading to coughing and wheezing. The duration of these symptoms can vary, lasting from several hours to days, depending on the severity of exposure [14, 26-30]. Miosis, or constricted pupils, is one of the first signs of either local (from liquid or vapor exposure) or systemic poisoning. Additionally, individuals may experience eye pain due to intense contraction of the ciliary muscles. This discomfort worsens with near-focus tasks or in bright light. Other ocular effects may include tearing, blurred vision, light sensitivity, eye spasms, and conjunctival redness.

If the poison is ingested, gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, diarrhea, and incontinence can occur [14, 31-35]. The progression of symptoms depends on how the agent enters the body: respiratory symptoms typically emerge first after inhalation, while gastrointestinal symptoms are more immediate after ingestion. The overall poisoning affects various body systems, including muscarinic, nicotinic, and central nervous system functions [14, 36-43].

Severe poisoning symptoms

In severe poisoning, the toxic effects of acetylcholine on nicotinic receptors in the neck ganglia lead to mydriasis (dilated pupils), tachycardia, and increased blood pressure. Additionally, muscle weakness that worsens with activity, twitching, muscle spasms, cramps, and flaccid paralysis can occur. Vasoconstriction, resulting in pale skin, is another symptom linked to nicotine poisoning caused by these agents. The weakening of respiratory muscles can lead to respiratory failure and, if untreated, death [43, 44].

In the central nervous system, even mild doses can cause symptoms such as anxiety, restlessness, mood swings, insomnia, vivid dreams, and nightmares. More severe effects include headaches, tremors, drowsiness, confusion, impaired judgment, memory loss, lack of coordination, and slower reactions. Seizures, absent reflexes, and abnormal breathing patterns, such as Cheyne-Stokes respiration, may develop. In the most severe cases, respiratory arrest can occur due to paralysis of the diaphragm and depression of the respiratory centers in the brainstem, leading to anoxia. Additionally, bradycardia and hypotension can result from the weakening of circulatory centers in the brain [1, 14, 43, 44].

The long-term effects of acute Novichok poisoning have been mostly observed in limited cases. One of the first known incidents of acute poisoning involved Andrei Zheleznyakov, a Russian scientist involved in the Novichok project, in 1987. He was exposed to Novichok aerosols due to a malfunction in the laboratory’s chemical hood. He quickly developed mydriasis, shortness of breath, excessive salivation, convulsions, bradycardia, respiratory paralysis, and coma. Although he survived after treatment, he suffered from severe neurological complications, including movement disorders and memory loss. He died five years later from liver cirrhosis, epilepsy, and inflammation of the trigeminal nerves [18]. Other cases of Novichok poisoning have shown a wide array of neurological and psychological complications, with delayed neurotoxicity appearing 1–3 weeks after exposure. These include severe muscle weakness, mental dysfunction, and memory issues [21, 43].

Treatment

The treatment for acute Novichok poisoning follows the same general principles as for other organophosphorus poisoning, including immediate emergency care such as airway management, respiratory support, and circulatory stabilization. Decontamination, patient stabilization, and administration of antidotes are essential components of treatment. In critically ill patients, intubation and mechanical ventilation are necessary, alongside cardiovascular support and continuous monitoring [14, 43, 44].

Laboratory diagnosis

While laboratory diagnosis is not essential for immediate treatment, it can provide valuable confirmation of poisoning, particularly in environmental samples (such as air, water, or soil) or biological samples from the affected individual or the deceased. Laboratory tests help distinguish poisoning from other conditions and determine the cause of death. However, due to the complexity, high cost, and specialized equipment requirements, the precise identification of the nerve agent involved may not always be feasible in standard laboratories.

One common diagnostic approach involves colorimetric tests to measure the activity of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase enzymes. This method is beneficial in hospitals for detecting exposure to organophosphorus agents, as these agents inhibit these enzymes. In practice, a blood sample from the patient is analyzed to determine acetylcholinesterase levels in red blood cells or butyrylcholinesterase levels in plasma. The Ellman method is frequently employed for this purpose, and the degree of enzyme inhibition correlates with the severity of poisoning. However, it is essential to note that this technique does not identify the specific agent involved [40, 45]. Additional diagnostic methods may include assessing enzyme activity, such as beta-glucuronidase and paraoxonase, which can help detect organophosphate poisoning [40].

For detecting nerve agents such as Novichok, Sarin, and VX in environmental samples, detection tubes are widely used. These devices rely on enzymatic color reactions and contain pellets coated with acetylcholinesterase or butyrylcholinesterase, along with a substrate and reagent. Detection tubes are portable, sensitive, easy to use, and effective across a range of environmental conditions, including those found in conflict zones or during terrorist attacks. They are an essential tool for field identification of nerve agents [45-48].

Butyrylcholinesterase enzyme is predominantly utilized in detection devices for nerve agents. The stability of the results depends heavily on the enzyme’s immobilization on a carrier, which has been optimized using materials such as magnesium aluminometasilicate. This material has a high contact surface area and serves as an effective protective layer for preparing detection pellets [49]. For identifying nerve agents, including Novichoks, especially in trace amounts within biological samples (such as blood, urine, and tissues like liver or lung) and non-biological samples (such as water, soil, air, food, or clothing), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) methods are the most sensitive and reliable techniques [50].

Conclusion

Novichoks represent the fourth generation of chemical weapons and are classified as nerve agents in Category A. These agents, like other nerve agents, are organophosphorus compounds and act as non-competitive, irreversible inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase. Despite their similarities to earlier G and V-class nerve agents, their unique structural features suggest they may be more toxic than older nerve agents. Observations of their toxic clinical effects in chemical terrorism incidents, coupled with molecular simulations, provide new insights into their potency. However, the initial belief that Novichoks are more toxic than other nerve agents, such as VX, has been questioned. In fact, despite their significant toxicity, rapid and standard treatment, including symptomatic and supportive care, mechanical ventilation, and administration of antidotes like atropine, oximes, and benzodiazepines, can lead to successful management of poisoning cases. Given the increasing threat of these agents in chemical terrorism, it is crucial for medical personnel to be well-versed in the fundamental and clinical toxicology of Novichoks.

Acknowledgements

None

Conflict of interest

None

Financial support

None

Ethics statement

None

References

Suchard JR. Chemical weapons. In: Nelson LS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Smith SW, Goldfrank LR, Hoffman RS, editors. Goldfrank’s toxicologic emergencies. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2019.
Martyshuk T, Gutyj B, Vyshchur O, Paterega I, Kushnir V, Bigdan OA, et al. Study of acute and chronic toxicity of Butaselmevit on laboratory animals. Arch Pharm Pract. 2022;13(3):70-5.
Sotnikov BA, Kravchenko VA, Shchuchka RV. The rate of crop residue decomposition as a function of the chemical composition of field crops. Entomol Appl Sci Lett. 2021;8(2):16-9.
Alshammari EM. Simultaneous detection of toxic and heavy metals in scalp hair samples of smokers. J Biochem Technol. 2022;13(1):50-6.
Dukueva MZ, Abdullayeva GR, Kagirov GM, Babaev ZR, Shapovalov LO, Danenko JI. Biological significance and toxicological properties of iron, selenium, and iodine. Pharmacophore. 2022;13(4):112-8.
Bigdan O. Toxicity of substance BKP-115 on rats and mice of both sexes at long-term intragastric administration. Arch Pharm Pract. 2021;12(2):6-11.
Ganesan K, Raza SK, Vijayaraghavan R. Chemical warfare agents. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010;2(3):166-78.
Alsubeie MS. Morphological, genetic characterization, and chemical analysis of castor bean (Ricinus communis) growing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Entomol Appl Sci Lett. 2023;10(1):38-44.
Alshammari EM. Biological monitoring of heavy metals in fingernails and scalp hair of autoworkers in Saudi Arabia. J Biochem Technol. 2022;13(1):57-64.
Dzhabrailova US, Vagabov VM, Akhaeva ZN, Kasimova ZZ, Kolesnikov SP, Bondarenko NG. Characterization of physico-chemical parameters and toxicological properties of neomycin. Pharmacophore. 2022;13(5):44-50.
Redzuan AM, Hui LY, Saffian SM, Islahudin FH, Bakry MM, Aziz SA. Features of digoxin toxicity in atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure patients: a systematic review. Arch Pharm Pract. 2023;14(1):50-5.
Mukherjee S, Gupta RD. Organophosphorus nerve agents: types, toxicity, and treatments. J Toxicol. 2020;2020:1-16.
Soltaninejad K, Shadnia S. History of the use and epidemiology of organophosphorus poisoning. In: Balali-Mood M, Abdollahi M, editors. Basic and clinical toxicology of organophosphorus compounds. London: Springer; 2014.
Weir AGA, Makin S, Breeze J. Nerve agents: emergency preparedness. BMJ Mil Health. 2020;166(1):42-6.
Nepovimova E, Kuca K. Chemical warfare agent Novichok: mini-review of available data. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;121:343-50.
Djahra AB, Zoubiri F, Benkaddour M, Gouasmia S. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity of Ephedra alata extract against intoxication with deltamethrin pesticide in male rats. Pharmacophore. 2023;14(1):19-24.
Lukey BJ, Romano JA Jr, Romano JA, Salem H. Chemical warfare agents: chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, and therapeutics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007.
Chai PR, Hayes BD, Erickson TB, Boyer EW. Novichok agents: a historical, current, and toxicological perspective. Toxicol Commun. 2018;2(1):45-8.
Patocka J. Novichok agents: mysterious poisonous substances from the Cold War period. Mil Med Sci Lett. 2018;87:1-3.
Kloske M, Witkiewicz Z. Novichoks: a group of organophosphorus chemical warfare agents. Chemosphere. 2019;221:672-82.
Franca TCC, Kitagawa DAS, Cavalcante SFA, Da Silva JAV, Nepovimova E, Kuca K. Novichoks: the dangerous fourth generation of chemical weapons. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1222.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051222
Loyola BR. Salisbury, Novichok, and the OPCW. Lupine Online J Pharmacol Clin Res. 2019;1(4):91-3.
Euronews. Novichok nerve agent attacks in England: what we know? [Internet]. Lyon: Euronews; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 9]. Available from: https://www.euronews.com/2018/09/05/skripals-poisoning-what-we-know-and-have-yet-to-find-out
GOV.UK. Novichok nerve agent used in Salisbury: UK government response [Internet]. London: GOV.UK; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/novichok-nerve-agent-use-in-salisbury-uk-government-respons
Costanzi S, Koblentz GD. Controlling Novichoks after Salisbury: revising the chemical weapons convention schedules. Nonprolif Rev. 2019;26(5-6):599-612.
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The incident in Salisbury [Internet]. The Hague: OPCW; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 2]. Available from: https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/featured-topics/incident-salisbury
France Diplomacy. Chemical weapons-OPCW report on the Skripal case (11 April 2018) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 5]. Available from: https://b2n.ir/n55080
The Guardian. Salisbury attack: inquest must look into the role of Russian officials, court told [Internet]. London: The Guardian; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Available from: https://b2n.ir/u51842
Counter Terrorism Policing. Salisbury and Amesbury investigation [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 9]. Available from: https://www.counterterrorism.police.uk/salisbury/
Galeotti M. The Navalny poisoning case through the hybrid warfare lens [Internet]. Helsinki: Hybrid CoE; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/publications/hybrid-coe-paper-4-the-navalny-poisoning-case-through-the-hybrid-warfare-lens/
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. OPCW issues report on technical assistance requested by Germany [Internet]. The Hague: OPCW; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 9]. Available from: https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2020/10/opcw-issues-report-technical-assistance-requested-germany
Euronews. Russia alleges Navalny could have been poisoned on the medical plane to Germany [Internet]. Lyon: Euronews; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.euronews.com/2020/11/12/russia-alleges-navalny-could-have-been-poisoned-on-medical-plane-to-germany
Mirzayanov VS. State secrets: an insider’s chronicle of the Russian chemical weapons program. Denver: Outskirts Press; 2008.
Ellison DH. Handbook of chemical and biological warfare agents. New York: CRC Press; 2007.
Hoenig SL. Compendium of chemical warfare agents. Berlin: Springer; 2006.
Imrit YA, Bhakhoa H, Sergeieva T, Danes S, Savoo N, Elzagheid MI, et al. A theoretical study of the hydrolysis mechanism of A-234. RSC Adv. 2020;10(47):27884-93.
Harvey SP, McMahon LR, Berg FJ. Hydrolysis and enzymatic degradation of Novichok nerve agents. Heliyon. 2020;6(1):e03153.
Carlsen L. After Salisbury nerve agents revisited. Mol Inform. 2019;38(8-9):1800106.
Dvir H, Silman I, Harel M, Terrone L, Rosenberry TL, Sussman JL. Acetylcholinesterase: from 3D structure to function. Chem Biol Interact. 2010;187(1-3):10-22.
Soltaninejad K. Biomarkers of organophosphorus compounds poisoning and exposure: a review. In: Dishovsky C, Radenkova-Saeva J, editors. Toxicological problems. Oxford: Military Publishing House; 2014.
Sirin GS, Zhou Y, Lior-Hoffmann L, Wang S, Zhang Y. Aging mechanism of soman-inhibited acetylcholinesterase. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116(40):12199-207.
Jeong K, Choi J. Theoretical study on the toxicity of Novichok agent candidates. R Soc Open Sci. 2019;6(8):190414.
Hulse EJ, Haslam JD, Emmett SR, Woolley T. Organophosphorus nerve agent poisoning: managing the poisoned patient. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(4):457-63.
Vale JA, Marrs TC, Maynard RL. Novichok: a murderous nerve agent attack in the UK. Clin Toxicol. 2018;56(11):1093-7.
Pohanka M. Diagnoses of pathological states based on acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27(18):2994-3011.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Nerve agents. Medical management of CBRN casualties [report]. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office; 2006 Jun. Report No.: AMedP-7.1.
Soltaninejad K, Shadnia S, Afkhami-Taghipour M, Saljooghi R, Mohammadirad A, Abdollahi M. Blood beta-glucuronidase as a suitable biomarker at acute exposure of severe organophosphorus poisoning in human. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007;26(12):963-6.
Zeman J, Vetchy D, Pavlokova S, Franc A, Pitschmann V, Dominik M, et al. Tubes for detection of cholinesterase inhibitors. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2019;128:26-33.
Zeman J, Vetchy D, Pavlokova S, Franc A, Pitschmann V. Unique coated neusilin pellets for detection of nerve agents. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020;179:113004.
Hosseini SE, Saeidian H, Amozadeh A, Naseri MT, Babri M. Fragmentation pathways and structural characterization of organophosphorus compounds. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2016;30(24):2585-93.

Author information

Ravi Kumar & Neha Sharma contributed to this work.

Authors and affiliations

Department of Pharmacology and Drug Development, Faculty of Pharmacy, IIT Delhi, New Delhi, India
Ravi Kumar & Neha Sharma

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Kumar

Rights and permissions

Open Access The author(s) retain copyright. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. It may be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes with appropriate attribution, an indication of changes, and distribution of adaptations under the same license. Third-party material may be subject to separate terms identified in its credit line. View the license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

About this article

Cite this article

Vancouver
Kumar R, Sharma N. The Toxicology of Novichok Nerve Agents: Mechanisms, Manifestations, and Management. . 0;0:30.
APA
Kumar, R., & Sharma, N. (0). The Toxicology of Novichok Nerve Agents: Mechanisms, Manifestations, and Management. EAMD 3, 0, 30.
Received
10 June 2021
Revised
22 July 2021
Accepted
18 October 2021
Published
10 January 2022
Version of record
10 January 2022

Share this article

Easily share this article with others using the link below:

The Toxicology of Novichok Nerve Agents: Mechanisms, Manifestations, and Management
Scan to access
this article

Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress:
Submission Portal Author Guidelines

Follow this journal
Get notified of new updates and articles.